Children - Floating Signifiers of advertising

It is essential for us marketers to understand the phrase or concept termed ‘Signifier’ with respect to marketing communication. ‘When an object or image is shown in a particular context in order to refer to some underlying meaning, it is a signifier of that meaning’. For instance, the use of Yuvraj Singh in marketing communiqués may signify the meaning of style, performance, etc. Marketers need to be vigilant while strategically placing these signifiers within the framework of a particular advertisement, through which they would be able to transfer meaning from the signifier to the product being communicated.

The focus of this post is on children being portrayed as floating signifiers. Commercials featuring children attempt to convey different sets of emotions and meaning which the kid being showcased in the Ad is intended to represent. These kids are expected to prompt a certain feeling or concept which has been tapped pretty well by most marketers. The most relevant feeling or emotion of the audience (target market) that a child can often tap is the cute, heart-warming attraction towards himself/herself and in turn towards the product being advertised. Children are also used in advertisements as referents to the future, purity and innocence, responsibility, chaos and fun. Check ads of Airtel and Vodafone that have been victorious in winning consumers’ attention. Having said this, it is an uphill task or an impossible one for marketers to appeal to audiences’ other emotions which could be - sense of identity with the endorser, confidence in the endorser, etc considered very vital in creating an unforgettable brand

However, it needs to be made clear that a child to become a regular brand endorser is difficult as the audiences tend to negate repetition, hence lowering brand recall and awareness. Children are better of being used as brand faces than being employed as brand ambassadors.

And remember everything depends on the context (product being advertised, target audience, brand positioning, etc.)!!

Who’d you pick - A Brand Ambassador or A Brand Face?

This question is quite clearly posed to marketers of whom would they choose to feature in their Ad campaigns. There is a need to define and also distinguish these two terms that could support a marketer’s choice. A brand ambassador is one who serves as the spokesperson for a particular brand, enhancing the brand image by appearing as a testimonial for the brand’s benefits. He or she becomes an integral part of the brand persona and helps build an emotional bond with the consumers. And this goes beyond just appearing in TV commercials to running promotional campaigns, to attending press conferences, to even using the product (brand being endorsed) so as to make it visible to the public. The brand ambassador transforms into a brand champion where he is associated with every aspect related to the brand that could also enhance his/her laurels.

Now, a Brand Face is just like a tool used to increase brand recall and would only appear in advertisements and nothing beyond that. Brand faces would have limited or temporary contract periods under their kitty for an instance Sona Chandi Chawanpryash using Sourav Ganguly for a while in its commercials. They are simply forgotten once the campaign ends. Now the question could arise – why choose or incorporate brand faces in the first place? Wouldn’t they create a temporary brand image that people can easily forget after the campaign ends? Yes, this is true, but it is important to know that everything is contextual and fits well with situations. This is also true with brand faces, that it is going to be appropriate to use them not for a long term brand building objective (which will rather be done by brand ambassadors), but for short term goals of promoting awareness of a newly launched product, or to communicate a discount in prices, and many such goals.

The choice therefore is based on the context or situation that a marketer or a brand manager faces.